Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Occup Environ Med ; 66(3): 263-271, 2024 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38242138

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the methods for identifying officers at high risk for cardiac events. METHODS: This retrospective review included 3330 patient charts. Classic cardiovascular risk factors, coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores, and endothelial inflammatory biomarker levels were compared between civilians and law enforcement officers (LEOs). The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) was compared with risk assessment using inflammatory biomarkers. RESULTS: The FRS failed to identify more than 90% of LEOs at high risk of cardiovascular events. Similarly, the use of the CAC score was ineffective. Inflammatory biomarker analysis measuring the lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A 2 activity was the most reliable method for identifying LEOs at high risk of cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the standard FRS and CAC scores is less effective than that of inflammatory biomarkers in identifying LEOs at high risk of cardiovascular events.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Humanos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/epidemiologia , Cálcio , Aplicação da Lei , Fatores de Risco , Medição de Risco/métodos , Biomarcadores , Fosfolipases
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...